This is How Language Symbolizes Your Judgment

Even your gesture wants to show your idea. The difference is, the idea is not uttered.

By language, it is able to discover the way you express judgment. The point to note is:  you are still doing such activity although you are talking to yourself. Minimally, you are ensuring yourself to value the object.

It is natural for human to judge by identifying positive and negative labels for the thing or person he is concerning with. The application is various. The labeling can refer to appearance or behavior.

It is possible to consciously express by using our verbalization along with the related attitudinal word in the statement as we say "the scenery is beautiful" or "that man is arrogant". Relating the word containing attitude can be semantically connected to create judgment. In addition, verbalization itself has shown an idea. That's why it has its own constituent because it reflects a concept.

I had experienced researching on how the chosen words affect the social relationship, even happening on fictional world. It is a good start to easily know as literary works exist with the experiences by human beings (see my research in Mulia, 2015; and journal in Mulia, 2016). It is an interesting issue to explore language with word-based critical interpretation.

These are the examples of how various "worlds" make the two-sides as the basis of judgment. Those sides are the polars. By putting negative word on an object, the object is meant having negativity and vice versa. It is also reflected on finite and polarity (e.g auxiliary verbs: do(not), does(not), is(not), are(not), am(not) and their past and perfect forms). The polarity affects its subject to make positive or negative value. So, subject and finite with its polarity are the set of negotiation device. Finite relates to the tense and polarity makes it positive or negative.

It is not just structure. It is about how language represent your mind towards something you are concerning with. The words you express are the realization of language function in complexity higher than graphology and phonology.